Experience of dynamic monitoring of a base isolated building of a marine station located in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky city

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2022-5-47-66

Authors:  
Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: dynamic monitoring, lead rubber bearing, seismic isolation, seismic isolation system
Annotation:

Introduction. The problem is considered and the relevance of studying the behavior of buildings and structures with seismic isolation systems using lead rubber bearing under real seismic impact, as well as assessing their technical condition after the earthquake, is emphasized. The experience of studying the behavior of base isolated buildings under real seismic impact abroad and in Russia is given.

Materials and methods. The dynamic parameters seismic isolation of a reinforced concrete building using lead rubber bearing are investigated. Registration of seismic vibrations of the building was performed by a stationary station for dynamic monitoring. The results of processing the records were obtained based on the interpretation of monitoring data, including harmonic analysis, determination of the power spectral density and signal transfer functions, as well as the application of wavelet transform methods.

Results. The data of dynamic monitoring of the seismically isolated building of the sea station located in the city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky for the reporting year 2021 of monitoring are presented. The analysis of the reaction and dynamic parameters of the building during the most intense seismic events for the reporting period was performed.

Conclusions. The analysis of the results showed that the system of seismic isolation of the building during earthquakes of low intensity operates in the area of the initial rigidity of the seismic isolation supports, and the dynamic parameters of the seismically isolated building depend on the intensity of the seismic impact. It is concluded that the time-frequency analysis using wavelet transform methods has advantages in the analysis of dynamic monitoring data of buildings and structures with seismic isolation systems over the Fourier transform. The methods for analyzing dynamic monitoring data described in this article can be effectively used to assess dynamic parameters and then analyze their changes during the operation of base isolated buildings and structures. The study presented in this article shows that with the help of dynamic monitoring of buildings and structures, one can get a more complete and detailed understanding of their dynamic behavior, identify damage in the structural system of a building, and detect their undesirable or specific reactions that could not be taken into account when designing.

Used Books:

1.              SP 14.13330.2018 Construction in seismic areas. Updated version of SNiP II-7-81* (with Amendments No. 2, 3). (In Russian)

2.              Boroschek R., Retamales R., Aguilar A. Seismic response of isolated structures subjected to Mw 8.8 Chile Earthquake of February 28, 2010. The International Symposium for CISNID 25th Aniversary, Paper No. M-2.

3.              Clemente P. Effectiveness of HDRB isolation systems under low energy earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 118, 2019, pp. 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.018

4.              Clemente P., Bongiovanni G., Buffarini G., Saitta F., Castellano M.G., Scafati F. Effectiveness of HDRB isolation systems under low energy earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 118 (2019), pp. 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.018

5.              Iiba M., Kashima T., Morita K. Behavior of Seismically Isolated Buildings Based on Observed Motion Records during the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Proc. 13th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures – commemorating JSSI 20th Anniversary. 2013. Paper No. 875925.

6.              Kashima T. Dynamic Behaviour of a Seven-Storey Seismically Isolated Building during the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. EACS 2016 – 6th European Conference on Structural Control, №127, 2016.

7.              Kashima T., Kitagawa T. Dynamic Behaviour of A 9-storey Base Isolated Building Estimated from Strong Motion Records, Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. No. 871, 2006.

8.              Kashima T., Kitagawa Y. Dynamic characteristics of buildings estimated from strong motion records. Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2006, pp. 18–22.

9.              Kashima T., Koyama T., Okawa I., Iiba M. Strong Motion Records in Buildings from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Proceeding of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). No.1762, 2012.

10.           Morita K., Takayama M. Lessons learned from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake: Building damages and behavior of seismically isolated buildings. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1892 (1): 020007, 2017. doi: 10.1063/1.5005638

11.           11. Moroni M.O., Sarrazin M., Soto P. (2012). Behavior of Instrumented Base-Isolated Structures during the 27 February 2010 Chile Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. 28, S1, S407–S424   doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.019

12.           Nagarajaiah S., Xiaohong S. Response of base-isolated USC hospital building in Northridge earthquake. Journal of structural engineering. 2000, pp.1177–1186.

13.           Performance of Seismic Protection Technologies during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake. K. Kasai, A. Mita, H. Kitamura, K. Matsuda, T.A. Morgan, A.W. Taylor. Earthquake Spectra. Volume 29, No. 1, pp. 265–293.

14.           Saito T. Performance of Seismically Isolated Buildings at March 11, 2011, Tohoku Earthquake. Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress. Brisbane, Australia, May 9–13, 2013.

15.           Saito. Behavior of response controlled and seismically isolated buildings during severe earthquakes in Japan. doi 10.12910/EAI2015-078.

16.           Seismic monitoring of buildings with base isolation. Salvatori A., Di Cicco A., Clemente P. 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, pp. 5254–5275. doi: 10.7712/120119.7301.19221

17.           Seismic response of building base isolated with filled rubber bearings under earthquakes of different characteristics. S. Jain, S. Thakkar. 12WCEE 2000.

18.              Shirazi A. (2010). Thermal degradation of the performance of elastomeric bearings for seismic isolation. UC San Diego. ProQuest ID: Shirazi_ucsd_0033D_10837. Merritt ID: ark:/20775/bb0103625m. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6j3486gj.

19.           Stewart J. P., Conte J. P., Aiken I.D. Observed behavior of seismically isolated buildings. Journal of structural engineering. 1999, pp. 955–964.

20.           Ventura C.E., Liam Finn W.D., Lord J.-F., Fujita N. Dynamic characteristics of a base isolated building from ambient vibration measurements and low level earthquake shaking. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. No. 23, 2003, pp. 313–322.

21.           Zhou C., Chase J. G., Rodgers G. W., Kuang A., Gutschmidt S., Xu C. Performance evaluation of CWH base isolated building during two major earthquakes in Christchurch. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 48, No. 4, 2015. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.48.4.264–273

22.           Giziatullin I.R., Bubis A.A., Vakhrina G.N., Chupanov M.R. Monitoring of dynamic behavior of the base isolated buildings and adjacent soils in the Kamchatka region. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. 2019: 7th, Rome, January 17–20, 2019, pp. 2667–2673.

23.           Gizyatullin I.R., Bubis A.A., Vakhrina G.N., Chupanov M.R. Analysis of the dynamic response of a building with a seismic isolation system under real seismic impact. Proceedings of the XIII Russian National Conference on Seismic Construction and Seismic Zoning (with international participation). St. Petersburg, July 01–06, 2019, p. 113. (In Russian)

24.           Vakhrina G.N., Chupanov M.R., Gizyatullin I.R. Analysis of the dynamic response of the building under real seismic impact. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety. 2018, no. 2, pp. 39–45. (In Russian)

25.           Gizyatullin I.R. Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a seismically isolated building using the results of numerical calculations and field observations: master's final qualification work: 08.04.01. Moscow state builds. university. Moscow, 2018. 93 p. (In Russian)

26.           Chebrov V.N., Droznin D.V., Kugaenko Yu.A., Levina V.I., Senyukov S.L., Sergeev V.A., Shevchenko Yu.V., Yashchuk V.V. System of detailed seismological observations in Kamchatka in 2011.Vulkanology and seismology. 2013, no. 1, pp. 18–40. doi:10.7868/S0203030613010021 (In Russian)

27.           Chebrova A.Yu., Chemarev A.S., Matveenko E.A., Chebrov D.V. Unified information system of seismological data in the Kamchatka branch of the FRC EGS RAS: principles of organization, basic elements, key functions. Geophysical Research. 2020, Volume 21, no. 3, pp. 66 – 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21455/gr2020.3-5. (In Russian)

28.           Grossmann A., Morlet J. (1984) Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis. 15, 723–736. doi:10.1137/0515056.

29.           Mallat S.G. A wavelet tour of signal processing. New York: Academic Press, 1998.

30.           Meyer Y. Wavelets: Algorithms and applications. Philadelphia: S.I.A.M., 1993.

31.           Meyer Y. Wavelets and operators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

32.           Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. Philadelphia: S.I.A.M., 1992.

33.           Pavlov A.N., Filatova A.E., Khramov A.E. Time-Frequency Analysis of Nonstationary Processes: Concepts of Wavelets and Empirical Modes. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Applied nonlinear dynamics. (2011). 19(2), 141–157. (In Russian)