Taking into account the difference in the support excitation for multi-supported structures
Taking into account the difference in the support excitation for multi-supported structures

Taking into account the difference in the support excitation for multi-supported structures

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2021-6-21-28

Authors:  

Zaalishvili V.B.
д-р физ.-мат. наук, проф., (Центр геофизических исследований ВНЦ РАН и РСО-А, г. Владикавказ)

Смирнова Любовь Николаевна Smirnova Lyubov N.,
Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Scientific secretary of JSC RCC. Moscow, Russian Federation

Natalia V. Nikonova
Candidate of Technical Sciences,  St. Petersburg State University of Railways of Emperor Alexander I.  St. Petersburg,  Russian Federation  lovelynataxa@inbox.ru

Уздин Александр Моисеевич Uzdin A.M.
Dr. of Eng, Emperor Alexander I St.Petersburg State Transport University


Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: multi-support structures, non-synchronicity of oscillations, correlation function, coherence index, amplitude divergence index inhomogeneity of the acceleration field
Annotation:

Three characteristics are proposed to describe the excitation differences under supports for calculating multi-supported structures. These characteristics include the non-synchronicity indicator t0, the incoherence indicator r and the non-uniformly scaled indicator z. The first characteristic shows the time shift between the excitations, the second characteristic shows the difference in the excitation frequency composition, and the third one shows the difference in the action amplitudes. To estimate the nonsynchrony index, two approaches have been proposed – maximizing the correlation function and minimizing the norm of the excitation difference. The proposed parameters fully characterize the acceleration inhomogeneity field at the construction site. However, they affect the system response in different ways. Small deviations in the index of excitation amplitudes z weakly reduce the structure response. As for the excitation incoherence, this effect can bring the system closer or away from resonance.

Used Books:

1.      Uzdin A.M., Kuznetsova I.O. Seismic resistance of bridges. – Saarbrucken (Germany): Palmarium, 2014. – 450 p.

2.      Giman L.N., Uzdin A.M. On one form of representation of seismic impact to assess the correlation of fluctuations of points of the day surface in the calculation of multi-support structures. Earthquake-resistant construction. Safety of structures. – 2006. – No. 2. – pp. 22-25.

3.      Uzdin A.M. Features of calculation of extended structures with point support on the ground by spectral method. Express information "Earthquake-resistant construction". – 1992. – No. 1. – pp. 32-37.

4.      Igusa T., Der Kiureghian. A. Dynamic response of multiply supported secondary systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. (ASCE). – 1985. – Vol. 111, no. 1. – P. 20–41.

5.      Petronijević M., Nefovska M., Brčić S. Multiple-support seismic analysis of bridges including soil-structure interaction. Proc. of 12-th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paper Reference 180.

Smirnova Lyubov, Uzdin Alexander, Polorotova Natalia, Freze Maxim. Important feature of calculating bridges under seismic action. E3S Web of Conferences 157, 06020 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015706020

Возврат к списку