Strengthening the security of Syrian architectural monuments with the help of seismic isolation technologies in order to reduce the negative impact of earthquakes on the psyche of people
Strengthening the security of Syrian architectural monuments with the help of seismic isolation technologies in order to reduce the negative impact of earthquakes on the psyche of people

Strengthening the security of Syrian architectural monuments with the help of seismic isolation technologies in order to reduce the negative impact of earthquakes on the psyche of people

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2022-4-58-80

Authors:  

Альдреби Зиад Ахмад Aldrebi Ziad Ahmad
Ph.D. (in Civil Engineering), Researcher, Lecturer-researcher, Civil engineer, “Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University”. Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation


Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: seismicity, earthquake, earthquake resistance, base isolation system, Great Mosque of Aleppo in Syria, damage, panic, architectural monuments, building structures
Annotation:

The article provides a definition of an earthquake and the causes of its occurrence, describes the types of seismic waves, which are divided into longitudinal and transverse. Three seismic intensity scales are compared, namely the modified Mercalli seismic scale, the 2017 seismic intensity scale, and the Japanese seismic scale. The following is a review of the negative impacts of earthquakes on the building, damage to various buildings in different countries as a result of an earthquake, the occurrence of such phenomena as landslides, soil liquefaction and rupture of the earth's crust, also as a result of an earthquake. The negative impact of earthquakes on the psyche and behavior of people, which causes panic, fear and seismophobia in humans, is considered. Further, it is proposed to use seismic isolation of buildings to reduce the negative impacts of earthquakes on people and buildings, using the example of the Great Mosque of Aleppo in Syria, which is an architectural monument and is included in the UNESCO World Heritage List. The description of the seismicity of the territory of Syria and the city of Aleppo is given, the High Damping Rubber Bearings (HDRB) proposed for use for seismic isolation of the mosque building are described. Formulas are given for calculating various parameters of such HDRB for their subsequent correct selection, depending on the forces acting on the building structures of the building. At the end, conclusions are drawn.

Used Books:

1.      Grunthal, G. Seismic hazard assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3. Ann. Geophys. Vol. 42 No. 6 (1999).

2.      Ambraseys, N. N. and Jackson, J. A. 1981. Earthquake hazard and vulnerability in the northeastern Mediterranean: The Corinth earthquake sequence of February-March 1981. Disasters 5(4): 355–368.

3.      Aldrebi Z. A. Seismic hazard of the territory of Syria. Earthquake Engineering. Constructions Safety. -2019. No. 6. pp. 43–48. (In Russian).

4.      SP 14.13330.2018 Construction in seismic areas. Updated edition of SNiP II-7-81 *, Moscow: Standartinform, 2018 - 116 p. (In Russian).

5.      GOST R 57546-2017 Earthquakes. Seismic intensity scale. M.: Standartinform, 2017. – 32 p. (In Russian).

6.      Medvedev S.V., Sponheuer V., Karnik V. Seismic intensity scale MSK-64. Moscow: Interdepartmental Geophysical Committee under the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1964. 17 p. (In Russian).

7.      Dengub V. M., Smirnov V. M. Seismic scale of Mercalli-Cancani. Units of quantities: dictionary-reference book. M., 1990. pp. 134–135. (In Russian).

8.      Vintzileou, E., Zagkotsis, A., Repapis, C., Zeris, C.: Seismic behaviour of the historical structural system of the island of Lefkada, Greece. Constr. Build. Mater. 21, 225–236 (2007).

9.      Makarios, T., Demosthenous, M.: Seismic response of traditional buildings of Lefkas Island Greece. Eng. Struct. 28, 264–278 (2006).

10. Aizenberg Ya. M. Seismic stability of structures and settlements, innovative solutions / Ya. M. Aizenberg, V. I. Smirnov // Urban planning. - 2013. - No. 1 (23). – P. 57–64. (In Russian).

11. Amosov A. A. Fundamentals of the theory of seismic stability of structures / A. A. Amosov, S. B. Sinitsyn. - M. : Publishing House of ASV, 2010. - 134 p. (In Russian).

12. Arnold K. Architectural design of earthquake-resistant buildings: translated from English. / K. Arnold, R. Reiterman. - M .: Stroyizdat. 1987. - 196 p. (In Russian).

13. Maslyaev, A. V. Seismic protection of buildings in settlements to preserve the life and health of people during an earthquake: monograph / A. V. Maslyaev; Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation, Volgograd. state tech. university. - Volgograd: VolgGTU, 2018. - 149 p. (In Russian).

14. Nazarenko Yu. V., Kolos I.V. Mental state and working capacity of victims; Research Institute of General and Forensic Psychiatry. V. P. Serbsky // Mental disorders in victims of an earthquake in Armenia: a collection of scientific papers M., 1989. pp. 41–48. (In Russian).

15. Maslyaev V.N. Accounting for the design of earthquake-resistant buildings of the reaction of people during an earthquake // Express-inform. VNIIIS Gosstroy of the USSR: Ser.14. Seismic construction. 1986. Issue. 6. pp. 40–49. (In Russian).

16. Maslyaev V.N. Influence of oscillations of building structures during earthquakes on people's reaction // Express-inform. VNIIIS Gosstroy of the USSR: Ser. 14. Seismic construction. 1987. Issue. 6. pp. 18–21. (In Russian).

17. Martemyanov A.I. Design and construction of buildings and structures in seismic regions: Textbook for universities. – M.: Stroyizdat, 1985. – 255 p. (In Russian).

18. SP 118.13330.2012. Public buildings and structures. Updated edition of SNiP 31-06-2009. M. : Ministry of Regional Development of Russia, 2012. -78 p. (In Russian).

19. Ershov I. A., Shebalin N. V. The problem of earthquake intensity scale design from the point of view of seismologists; Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Physics of the Earth named after O. Yu. Schmidt // Forecast of seismic effects. Issues of engineering seismology. M., 1984. Issue. 25, pp. 78–95. (In Russian).

20. Abdurashidov K.S., Vedernikov A.A. Consequences of the Gazli earthquake //Architecture and construction of Uzbekistan. 1984. No. 8, pp. 12–17. (In Russian).

21. Aizenberg, Ya.M., Response spectra during the Gazli earthquake on May 17, 1976, and adaptive behavior of systems with varying stiffness, Ref. inform. CYNIS: Ser. 14. Seismic construction. 1977. No. 9, pp. 21–28. (In Russian).

22. Aldrebi Z. A., Monitoring and certification of the most famous architectural monuments in Syria / Z. A. Aldrebi // Izv. Petersburg state University of Communication. - SPb .: PGUPS, 2018.– V. 15(2).– pp. 302–310. (In Russian).

23. Belash T. A. Analysis of damage to the architectural monuments of Syria resulting from earthquakes and hostilities / T. A. Belash, Z. A. Aldrebi // Earthquake Engineering. Constructions Safety. - 2016. - No. 5. – pp.58–63. (In Russian)

24. Alafandi R., Rahim, A. A.  Umayyad Mosque in Aleppo yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 2014. 07 (05) p.p.319–347.

25. SP 20.13330.2016 Loads and impacts. Updated edition of SNiP 2.01.07-85 *, M.: TsNIISK named after V.A.Kucherenko, 2016. – 107 p. (In Russian).

SP 15.13330.2020. Stone and reinforced stone structures. Updated 

Возврат к списку